Acebeam L35 2.0 vs Olight Warrior X Turbo size comparison

By · Updated · How we compare and rank

The Olight Warrior X Turbo is 5 mm (0.20 in) longer than the Acebeam L35 2.0, and 4 mm wider at its widest point. Weights are published on different bases (listed vs listed), so compare them with care.

Acebeam L35 2.0 · 152 mmOlight Warrior X Turbo · 157 mm

The Olight Warrior X Turbo is 5 mm (0.20 in) longer than the Acebeam L35 2.0, and 4 mm wider at its widest point. Weights are published on different bases (listed vs listed), so compare them with care.

Dimensions

Acebeam L35 2.0
Check price ↗
Olight Warrior X Turbo
Check price ↗
Length152 mm (5.98 in)157 mm (6.18 in)+5 mm
Head / width54 mm (2.13 in)58 mm (2.28 in)+4 mm
Body25 mm (0.98 in)26 mm (1.02 in)+1 mm
Weight249 g listed294 g listed
Battery2170021700
Max output5,000 lm1,100 lm
Throw650 m1000 m
TypeThrower / searchThrower / search not on olight.com (US)
Price$114.95 at batteryjunction.com, as of Nov 4, 2026not verified yet
Sourcebatteryjunction.com sourcedbatteryjunction.com sourced

We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Rankings are never paid for. Disclosure

L35 2.0 vs Warrior X Turbo: how they differ

Size and weight

The Acebeam L35 2.0 is the shorter light: 152 mm (5.98 in) against 157 mm (6.18 in), a difference of 5 mm (3%). At its widest point the Acebeam L35 2.0 is 4 mm slimmer (54 vs 58 mm). Weights are published on different bases (Acebeam L35 2.0: 249 g listed; Olight Warrior X Turbo: 294 g listed), so they are not directly comparable.

Brightness and throw

The Acebeam L35 2.0 is rated brighter: 5,000 lm maximum vs 1,100 lm for the Olight Warrior X Turbo, 355% more. For beam distance the Olight Warrior X Turbo reaches further: 1000 m vs 650 m rated throw (54% more).

Battery

Both run on a removable 21700 battery, so spare cells work in either light.

Type

Both are throwers / search lights in our catalog with a tube body.

Which should you buy?

Choose the Acebeam L35 2.0 if you want a shorter light (5 mm shorter), a slimmer profile (4 mm narrower) and more output (5,000 lm vs 1,100 lm). Choose the Olight Warrior X Turbo if you want longer throw (1000 m vs 650 m). We compare published size, weight, output, throw and battery only, not runtime, interface or build quality.

Check price ↗ Acebeam L35 2.0 Check price ↗ Olight Warrior X Turbo

We may earn a commission from these links, at no cost to you. Rankings are never paid for. Disclosure

L35 2.0 vs Warrior X Turbo FAQ

Which is smaller, the Acebeam L35 2.0 or the Olight Warrior X Turbo?

The Acebeam L35 2.0 is the shorter light: 152 mm (5.98 in) against 157 mm (6.18 in), a difference of 5 mm (3%). At its widest point the Acebeam L35 2.0 is 4 mm slimmer (54 vs 58 mm). Weights are published on different bases (Acebeam L35 2.0: 249 g listed; Olight Warrior X Turbo: 294 g listed), so they are not directly comparable.

Which is brighter, the Acebeam L35 2.0 or the Olight Warrior X Turbo?

The Acebeam L35 2.0 is rated brighter: 5,000 lm maximum vs 1,100 lm for the Olight Warrior X Turbo, 355% more. For beam distance the Olight Warrior X Turbo reaches further: 1000 m vs 650 m rated throw (54% more).

Do the Acebeam L35 2.0 and Olight Warrior X Turbo use the same battery?

Both run on a removable 21700 battery, so spare cells work in either light.

Compare Acebeam L35 2.0 with similar lights

L35 2.0 vs TK28RL35 2.0 vs LR35R PRO 10000L35 2.0 vs HT32L35 2.0 vs LR36RL35 2.0 vs LR35RL35 2.0 vs L19 2.0

Compare Olight Warrior X Turbo with similar lights

Warrior X Turbo vs LR36RWarrior X Turbo vs L19 2.0Warrior X Turbo vs HT32RWarrior X Turbo vs HT32Warrior X Turbo vs LR35R PRO 10000Warrior X Turbo vs TK28R

More

Acebeam L35 2.0 size & specsOlight Warrior X Turbo size & specsBest 21700 flashlightsLongest throw flashlightsBrightest flashlightsAll Acebeam lightsAll Olight lightsBest EDC flashlights

Sources

Found an error? Email [email protected] and we will fix it.